My verdict
Enthusiastic first impression
Type
Extract
Subtype
Other / unspecified
Strain / cultivar
Neonz
Package weight
Not recorded
Total paid
Not recorded
Tax
Not recorded
Purchase context
A terp case was gifted; whether the hash was purchased or gifted is not recorded.
Would buy again?
Not recorded

From the event

Good seeing the Wooksauce team at Puffcon. The Neonz was about as greasy as it gets, and seriously tasty. I wrote that it was looking like a fruit roll-up on the paper. That was a description of how it looked, not a detailed fruit-flavor breakdown.

This was a day-at-Puffcon impression rather than a finished-jar review. The Neonz made me stop and say something about it. I hadn’t worked out a detailed flavor description; I was busy enjoying how greasy and tasty it was.

The team also gifted me a terp case, which saved me when my other cooler ran out of room. That gift belongs in the disclosure. My post doesn’t establish whether the hash itself was bought or gifted.

OUTSIDE READING · NOT MY TASTING NOTES

A little more context

Sinsemillaville’s review of Masterball Melts × Mendoja Farms Neonz describes candy-like Z flavor alongside gas. It’s related reading, not a Wooksauce review: a different producer, explicitly cold-cure rosin, with no batch match to mine. I’m not using its tasting notes to fill in my own. [N1]

The name also appears on a Greasy Couture flower review by feartheterps at The Highest Critic. That’s another reason to name the producer and format rather than treat every Neonz review as the same product. [N2]

A gifted accessory is disclosed; the hash’s payment status remains unknown. Neither outside review is of my Wooksauce jar.

Sources & review notes

The main review comes from my own posts and follow-up notes. Outside descriptions stay in the separately labeled section above; they aren’t additional tasting notes from me.

My original posts

Outside reading

  • [N1] Neonz by Masterball Melts × Mendoja FarmSinsemillaville · Publication date not established

    Same cultivar name; different producer and confirmed cold-cure rosin format.

    No Wooksauce match. Publication date and a clear compensation disclosure weren’t available in the extracted page.

  • [N2] Strain Review: NeonZ by Greasy Couturefeartheterps / The Highest Critic · 2023-01-13

    Same cultivar name; different producer and flower format.

    Not evidence for Wooksauce flavor, processing, potency, or lineage.

Product fact sources

Product facts are recorded separately from outside reading. A recorded name is not verified genetics; an unknown value is not zero. Original notes, uncertainty, and source references are retained in the editorial record.

  • classification · type

    Extract

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes. Mapped from the original item description.

  • classification · subtype

    Other / unspecified

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes. Hash is recorded; the specific process is unknown.

  • identity · brand

    Wooksauce Winery

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes.

  • identity · product name

    Neonz

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes.

  • identity · cultivar

    Neonz

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes. Name as recorded in the review; genetic identity and lineage not independently verified.

  • purchase · context

    A terp case was gifted; whether the hash was purchased or gifted is not recorded.

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes.

  • experience · flavor

    The Neonz was about as greasy as it gets, and seriously tasty.

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes. Verbatim excerpt from the existing firsthand review; read with its full context and qualifications.

  • experience · texture

    The Neonz was about as greasy as it gets, and seriously tasty.

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes. Verbatim excerpt from the existing firsthand review; read with its full context and qualifications.

  • experience · verdict

    Enthusiastic first impression

    m0nty’s existing review and recorded firsthand notes.

Outside reading checked in October 2026. Individual reviews are anecdotal; neither a shared strain name nor a shared producer proves a matching batch. No outside photography is reused.